Why YOU should join the "T" Party

Due to unforeseen events, namely the phenomenon of Tea Parties taking place across the nation on April 15th, 2009, I have taken the liberty of renaming this blog "T" Party Headquarters. I originally chose the name Tea Party because of word play on "T" for third party and the concept of tossing things overboard. That said, please read on.

On December 16, 1773 the Sons of Liberty boarded three ships, the Dartmouth, Eleanor, and the Beaver, and dumped over 342 tea casks into Boston Harbor. Whether or not that event changed the world is subject to debate. Nonetheless, it did garner attention in both England and the Colonies. The Boston Tea Party also symbolizes rebellion against establishment. I wish to capitalize on the sentiment of rebellion and hopefully get the attention of the establishment. The esatblishment, in this case, is a Congress filled with Washington type, career politicians who no longer represent John Q. Public.

A serious third party in the United States faces some pretty unsurmountable obstacles such as share of voice, and lack of financial backing. My idea behind forming an ad hoc third party is actually quite simple; no party leadership, no need to get names on ballots, just a simple grassroots effort to vote out incumbents. Forget about political ideologies and/or loyalties, just dump all the bums overboard! Let's face it, there is no substantial difference between Democrats and Republicans--both parties are beholden to special interests, they both spend a ton of money they don't actually have and both parties routinely fill their pockets with tons of pork and earmarks. Right now, Congress has the worst approval rating in history and they aren't the least bit worried about getting re-elected. They just keep looking out for themselves and ignoring their social contract. Let's send them a message. Vote out all congressional incumbents, and keep voting them out, until they figure out how to actually represent "we the people".

Friday, October 24, 2008

Regarding Term Limits

From 1990 to 1994 I struggled to pay for my higher education through a series of unfortunate and unpleasant job choices. One of the first was doing telephone surveys during the 1990 midterm elections. I believe desperation drives people to do things they would normally avoid and only desperation could have driven me to apply for that job. I also suppose desperation led that company to hire just about anybody; including me. However, the fact that I accepted that job offer incontrovertibly proves a person can be possessed by the devil, an alien or some other being from another dimension.

Only two good things came from that experience. First, I paid for my tuition. Second, I learned that most people aren't logical; they are misinformed, uninformed, disengaged or just plain emotional. It didn't matter what state I surveyed, almost everyone I talked to thought the country was, "headed in the wrong direction," and, "disapproved of," or, "strongly disapproved of," the job Congress currently did. The odd thing was most of them thought their incumbent Representative or Senator did an outstanding job! That makes no sense at all and I doubt that outcome has changed one bit in 2008. The only way I can explain it is by choosing one of the non-logical descriptions I mentioned earlier.

In my opinion, what happens is Congress pleases most of their local constituents so they can get reelected and completely misses the bigger national picture. For example, a simple emergency measure becomes a 500 page behemoth full of earmarks. Congressman A tells Congresswoman B that the only way he'll vote for a bill to help people in her state X who are suffering from natural disaster Y is if he can get some money to build a bridge with his name on it back in his state Z. The obvious solution, of course, is term limits. However, that poses a problem.

During the 1990s, 23 states put measures on their ballots to limit terms in Congress. They all overwhelmingly passed. Unfortunately, in 1995 the Supreme Court, in a 5 to 4 decision, ruled that states could not impose term limits on their Representatives or Senators. The only way term limits will ever become a reality, is if Congress passes legislation to limit their own terms. While Congress readily legislates themselves raises, I'm pretty certain they aren't going to limit the length of their own careers. Regardless, they still have to get reelected every two to six years and that's where the Tea Party comes in. If we remove incumbents, we limit terms. There is nothing Congress or the Supreme Court can do to stop that. This has to be a populist, grassroots initiative and that requires everyone to tell everyone else about the Tea Party. We may be too late for the 2008 election, but there WILL be another election in 2010.

Bookmark and Share